Overview
Latvia is the lowest scoring in terms of Policy Context, having no severe asthma guidelines, no general asthma strategy, a lack of alignment of national care guidelines with international guidelines, and a lack of reporting to severe asthma registries. However, Latvia shows the second highest level of tobacco control laws. Latvia has one of the lowest scores in terms of Health System Characteristics, which is attributable to having the highest average number of days spent in hospital due to asthma and a relatively high level of annual asthma-related hospitalisations. In spite of these results, Latvia’s score in Disease Burden is slightly above the average, with the third lowest societal cost attributable to severe asthma, the fourth lowest number of DALYs attributable to asthma, and the second lowest percentage of deaths attributable to asthma. The highest rate of tobacco use, and a relatively high adult obesity rate limit Latvia from scoring higher in this category.
How does Latvia perform in each category?
Provides further insights into how Latvia scores across each Index category
Latvia takeaways
Data from the Severe Asthma Index revealed the following key insights about severe asthma care in Latvia
Latvia is the lowest ranking in terms of Policy Context with no asthma strategy or severe asthma guidelines
Latvia is the second highest in terms of tobacco control laws to address high levels of tobacco use
Latvia has the highest average number of days spent in hospital due to asthma, though low societal cost and deaths attributable to asthma despite high rates of obesity and tobacco use
Compare Latvia to other countries
Select different countries to see how they scored across each of the 5 categories and overall